Dave and I were playing around with the name of our app last night. Initially, we were going to name it after its hierarchical function. After a little thought and some trolling through the app store we decided to focus on the app’s purpose rather than its features. Once the name changed, it was clear we needed to modify the design. As if that’s not enough, we’re also toying with the idea of changing how users access the camera function as they move through the screens. Changing where and when the camera button appears might interfere with the expected functionality because of the human interface guidelines.
We’re basically back to wireframing again.
Human interface guidelines are Apple’s set of rules about how they think the apps should function–it’s their best practices on app UI. HIG is the design and architecture principles that are based on the way people think and work–not the capabilities of the device. So, we’re asking ourselves: for a productivity app like ours do we need to have the camera function available on all screens? Or, is it dis-intuitive that a user will use the camera function on any but one point in their creation of a record? If the latter case is true then using precious space for the camera on all screens is a bad idea.
Clearly, my mind is spinning a web and I would give my left arm for some real market research.
In addition to rethinking our human interface we are reworking the design to fit better with the new name. So much for all that time spent on what has become a handful of truly elegant screens.
We’re treading carefully here. That last thing we want is a clumsy aesthetic. The drawing board is calling.




